All publications by Gawthrop in 1998

[1] P. J. Gawthrop, H. Demircioglu, and I. Siller-Alcala. Multivariable continuous-time generalised predictive control: A state-space approach to linear and nonlinear systems. CSC Research Report CSC-98001, Centre for Systems and Control, University of Glasgow, 1998. [ bib ]
[2] E. Ronco and P. J. Gawthrop. Two controller networks automatically constructed through system linearisations and learning. CSC Research Report CSC-98002, Centre for Systems and Control, University of Glasgow, 1998. [ bib ]
[3] P.J. Gawthrop. Bond graphs, symbolic algebra and the modelling of complex systems. CSC Research Report CSC-98003, Centre for Systems and Control, University of Glasgow, 1998. [ bib ]
[4] R.F. Ngwompo and P.J. Gawthrop. Bond graph based simulation of inverse systems using physical performance specifications. CSC Research Report CSC-98004, Centre for Systems and Control, University of Glasgow, 1998. [ bib ]
[5] Peter Gawthrop and Taner Arsan. Exact linearisation is a special case of non-linear GPC. CSC Research Report CSC-98005, Centre for Systems and Control, University of Glasgow, 1998. [ bib ]
[6] Peter J. Gawthrop and Donald J. Ballance. Bond graphs in the design of engineering systems. CSC Research Report CSC-98007, Centre for Systems and Control, University of Glasgow, 1998. [ bib ]
[7] Eric Ronco, Taner Arsan, and Peter J. Gawthrop. Open-loop intermittent feedback control: Practical continuous-time GPC. CSC Research Report CSC-98015, Centre for Systems and Control, University of Glasgow, 1998. [ bib ]
[8] Peter J. Gawthrop, Donald J. Ballance, and Genevieve Dauphin-Tanguy. Controllability indicators from bond graphs. CSC Research Report CSC-98016, Centre for Systems and Control, University of Glasgow, 1998. [ bib ]
[9] Peter J. Gawthrop. Thermal modelling using mixed energy and pseudo bond graphs. CSC Research Report CSC-98017, Centre for Systems and Control, University of Glasgow, 1998. [ bib ]
[10] Peter J. Gawthrop. Extruder modelling with mtt. CSC Research Report CSC-98018, Centre for Systems and Control, University of Glasgow, 1998. [ bib ]
[11] Wen-Hua Chen, Donald J. Ballance, and Peter J. Gawthrop. Nonlinear generalised predictive control and optimal dynamical inversion control. CSC Research Report CSC-98019, Centre for Systems and Control, University of Glasgow, 1998. [ bib ]
[12] Peter J. Gawthrop. Physical interpretation of inverse dynamics using bond graphs. The Bond Graph Digest, 2(1):23pp, January 1998. [ bib ]
[13] Peter J. Gawthrop. Bond graphs, symbolic algebra and the modelling of complex systems. In Proceedings of the UKACC conference “Control '98”, Swansea, U.K., 1998. [ bib | .pdf ]
The paper discusses the generation of symbolic models of complex systems using hierarchical bond graphs. The uses to which such models can be put include simulation code generation, linearisation, system inversion for actuator sizing and controller design. This methodology is illustrated with reference to three modelling projects: aircraft systems, plastic-onto-wire extrusion and a gravity wave detector

[14] P.J. Gawthrop and T. Arsan. Exact linearisation is a special case of non-linear gpc (abstract only). In F Allgower and A. Zheng, editors, Preprints of Int. Symposium on Nonlinear Model Predictive Control: Assessment and Future Directions, Ascona, Switzerland, page 37, June 1998. [ bib | www: ]
The continuous-time generalised predictive controller is shown to include the exact-linearisation controller as a special case. An alternative (prediction-free) version of GPC is shown to provide one possible extension of exact linearisation to cope with nonlinear systems with unstable dynamics.

[15] P.J. Gawthrop, H. Demircioglu, and I.I. Siller-Alcala. Multivariable continuous-time generalised predictive control: a state-space approach to linear and nonlinear systems. Control Theory and Applications, IEE Proceedings -, 145(3):241 --250, may 1998. [ bib | DOI ]
The multivariable continuous-time generalised predictive controller (CGPC) is recast in a state-space form and shown to include generalised minimum variance (GMV) and a new algorithm, predictive GMV (PGMV) as special cases. Comparisons are drawn with the exact linearisation methods of nonlinear control, and it is noted that, unlike the transfer function approach, the state-space approach extends readily to the nonlinear case. The resulting state space design algorithms are conceptually and algorithmically simpler than the corresponding transfer function based versions and have been realised as a freely available Matlab tool-box

Keywords: CGPC;Matlab tool-box;PGMV;exact linearisation methods;generalised minimum variance;linear systems;multivariable continuous-time generalised predictive control ;nonlinear control;nonlinear systems;predictive GMV;state space design algorithms;state-space approach;transfer function based versions;multivariable control systems;nonlinear control systems;predictive control;state-space methods;
[16] T. A. Johansen, K. J. Hunt, P. J. Gawthrop, and H. Fritz. Off-equilibrium linearisation and design of gain scheduled control with application to vehicle speed control. Control Engineering Practice, 6(2):167--180, 1998. [ bib | .pdf ]
In conventional gain-scheduled control design, linearisation of a time-invariant nonlinear system and local control design for the resulting set of linear time-invariant systems is performed at a set of equilibrium points. Due to its validity only near equilibrium, such a design may result in poor transient performance. To resolve this problem, one can base the control design on a dynamic linearisation about some nominal trajectory. However, a drawback with this approach is that control design for the resulting linear time-varying system is in general a difficult problem. In this paper it is suggested that linearisation and local controller design should be carried out not only at equilibrium states, but also in transient operating regimes. It is shown that this results in a set of time-invariant linearisations which, when they are interpolated, form a close approximation to the time-varying system resulting from dynamic linearisation. Consequently, the transient performance can be improved by increasing the number of linear time-invariant controllers. The feasibility of this approach, and possible improvements in transient performance, are illustrated with results from an experimental vehicle speed-control application.

[17] T. A. Johansen, K. J. Hunt, and P. J. Gawthrop. Transient performance, robustness and off-equilibrium linearization in fuzzy gain scheduled control. In D. Driankov and R. Palm, editors, Advances in Fuzzy Control, chapter 13, pages 357--375. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1998. [ bib ]
[18] P.J. Gawthrop. Mtt: Model transformation tools -- home page. Technical report, http://www.mech.gla.ac.uk/ peterg/software/MTT/, 1998. [ bib ]

This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.98.